| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 5 post(s) |
VIncent Vance
Gallente
Aliastra
   |
Posted - 2011.03.27 21:15:00 -
[1]
Props to CCP & Greyscale for the proposed changes. Ignore the 'BFF' plebs rantings on this one; maybe in future their membership will consist of more than empire carebears moving to 0.0 to get a higher 'isk per hr' rate by chain running sanctums till their eyes bleed....
|
VIncent Vance
Gallente
Aliastra
|
Posted - 2011.03.27 21:20:00 -
[2]
 Originally by: Any Red
CCP, your players do NOT want this change. NONE of them.
lol how the **** can you speak for all the playerbase? Being part of the NC 'Shortbus' crew isn't representative of most....
|
VIncent Vance
Gallente
Aliastra
|
Posted - 2011.03.28 22:14:00 -
[3]
Edited by: VIncent Vance on 28/03/2011 22:15:01
Excellent work Greyscale, keep up the good work. The rivers of tears flowing from the north can only be considered good omens.
Now, we need to once and for all move those lvl4s to losec, that should solve the empire/nullsec risk vs reward disparity that certain posters are trotting out as an excuse to continue their compulsive 0.0 carebearing rut.
|
VIncent Vance
Gallente
Aliastra
|
Posted - 2011.03.28 23:03:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Terianna Eri
Originally by: VIncent Vance
im a clueless idiot / so desperate for attention i'll troll a 99.5% unanimous thread
fyp
lol I used to be a member of one of your 'shortbus team' alliance neighbours till the 99.99% carebear outlook of most of the members prompted me to quit.
And you suggest I should just support this due to the other "99.5% unanimous" sheep like yourself? .....hmmm actually I guess being a sheep is a requirement for being a full time NC drone.
The only thing I can say in favour of WTF is that they weren't quite as fail as your lot lol
|
VIncent Vance
Gallente
Aliastra
|
Posted - 2011.03.28 23:08:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Corin Nebulon
Greyscale you should really ask for someone to handle public relations for you. Your last post really reads like "F*** *ff eve community. We know better then you."
Have you ever considered to make the changes in a way, that they have less impact? Just to see if the changes at least show a tendency to the behavior you predicted?
But no, in good old fashion the nerf hammer is applied. Without even considering that the negative outcomes may, by far, outweight the positives. And afterwards this will take another 2 years until you realise and admit your failure and another 2 years to get it balanced again...*sigh*
Sometimes following the development process of this game really is saddening.
lol tbh I think the likes of yourself (and RZR) are scared ****less that you may have to actually personally fight for your space as alliances in the near future, instead of the mega-coalition nodebreaking blobs full of buffer z-team filler you've been acustomed to for a long time now. You guys had it once, you think you'll still have it when the chips are down?
|
VIncent Vance
Gallente
Aliastra
|
Posted - 2011.03.29 21:26:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Frodo Teabaggins
To CCP: good. im glad you stuck with the plan.
To... everyone else: tee hee.
otherwise, a good change. its good to see EVE becoming just a bit harder.
Couldn't agree more. 
|
VIncent Vance
Gallente
Aliastra
|
Posted - 2011.03.30 21:38:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Terianna Eri
Originally by: Marconus Orion
please give me attention i'll even use red letters for it
The crux of the matter is that sanctums were BARELY better than level4s as it is.
Making vast regions of 0.0 worse then Empire can't possibly do anything good for the game. Why should I make less isk/hour in 0.0 when i could do it in highsec with less risk? Why should a group of people share the bad anoms in 0.0 when a single level4 system can support infinity people making better isk/hour?
Indeed, lvl4 missions in hi-sec empire need to be severely nerfed, or at least moved out to losec.
|
| |
|